Free Juniper JN0-637 Übungsprüfungen - Seite 5 von 5

Question #41

Exhibit:

Referring to the exhibit, a default static route on SRX-1 sends all traffic to ISP-A. You have configured APBR to send all requests for streaming video traffic to ISP-B. However, the return traffic from the streaming video server is coming through ISP-A, and the traffic is being dropped by SRX-1. You can only make changes on SRX-1.

How do you solve this problem?

A . Place both ISP-facing interfaces in the same zone.
B . Change the APBR routing instance from a forwarding instance to a virtual router instance.
C . Enable AppTrack to keep track of the sessions and zones for the streaming video traffic.
D . Configure BGP to control the return path of the streaming video traffic.

Lösung einblenden Lösung ausblenden

Question #42

You are deploying IPsec VPNs to securely connect several enterprise sites with ospf for dynamic routing. Some of these sites are secured by third-party devices not running Junos.

Which two statements are true for this deployment? (Choose two.)

A . OSPF over IPsec can be used for intersite dynamic routing.
B . Sites with overlapping address spaces can be supported.
C . OSPF over GRE over IPsec is required to enable intersite dynamic routing
D . Sites with overlapping address spaces cannot be supported.

Lösung einblenden Lösung ausblenden

Richtige Antwort: BC
BC

Explanation:

Understanding the Scenario:

Objective: Deploy IPsec VPNs connecting multiple enterprise sites using OSPF for dynamic routing.

Challenge: Some sites use third-party devices not running Junos OS.

Considerations:

Compatibility between Juniper and third-party devices.

Support for dynamic routing protocols (OSPF) over IPsec VPNs.

Handling overlapping IP address spaces.

Option Analysis:

Option A: OSPF over IPsec can be used for intersite dynamic routing.

OSPF Characteristics:

OSPF uses multicast addresses (224.0.0.5 and 224.0.0.6) for neighbor discovery and routing updates.

IPsec Limitations:

Standard IPsec tunnel mode does not support multicast traffic natively. Multicast traffic cannot traverse IPsec tunnels unless encapsulated. Juniper Solution:

Juniper devices can use routed VPNs (route-based VPNs) with st0 interfaces, allowing OSPF over IPsec.

However, this requires support from both ends of the VPN tunnel.

Third-Party Devices:

May not support OSPF over IPsec without additional configurations.

Conclusion:

Option A is not universally true in this scenario due to third-party device limitations.

Reference: "OSPF can be run over IPsec VPNs using route-based VPNs, but interoperability with third-party devices must be verified."

Source: Juniper TechLibrary – OSPF over IPsec VPNs

Option B: Sites with overlapping address spaces can be supported.

Overlapping IP Address Spaces:

Occurs when different sites use the same IP subnets.

Can cause routing ambiguities and conflicts.

Solution:

NAT over VPN:

Use Network Address Translation (NAT) to translate overlapping IP addresses to unique addresses.

Juniper devices support NAT over IPsec VPNs.

Third-Party Device Considerations:

Need to ensure third-party devices support NAT over IPsec. Many enterprise-grade devices provide this functionality. Conclusion:

Option B is true; overlapping address spaces can be supported using NAT.

Reference: "When sites have overlapping IP addresses, NAT can be used over IPsec VPNs to resolve address conflicts."

Source: Juniper TechLibrary – NAT with IPsec VPNs

Option C: OSPF over GRE over IPsec is required to enable intersite dynamic routing.

GRE Tunnels:

Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) can encapsulate multicast and broadcast traffic.

Allows OSPF packets to be transmitted over IPsec VPNs.

IPsec Encryption:

GRE tunnels can be encrypted using IPsec for secure communication.

Interoperability:

GRE over IPsec is a common method to support OSPF between devices from different vendors. Third-party devices are more likely to support GRE over IPsec than OSPF over IPsec directly. Conclusion:

Option C is true; using OSPF over GRE over IPsec is required in this scenario.

Reference: "To run OSPF between devices that do not support multicast over IPsec, GRE tunnels can be used over IPsec VPNs."

Source: Juniper TechLibrary – Configuring GRE over IPsec

Option D: Sites with overlapping address spaces cannot be supported.

Contradicts Option B.

As established, overlapping address spaces can be supported using NAT over IPsec VPNs.

Conclusion:

Option D is false.

Conclusion:

Correct Answers: B and C

Option B: Overlapping address spaces can be supported using NAT over IPsec VPNs.

Option C: OSPF over GRE over IPsec is required to enable intersite dynamic routing, especially when third-party devices are involved.

Additional Detailed

Why OSPF over IPsec May Not Be Feasible (Option A):

Multicast Traffic:

OSPF relies on multicast for neighbor discovery and updates. IPsec in tunnel mode does not natively support multicast traffic. Third-Party Devices:

May not support proprietary extensions or configurations required to run OSPF directly over IPsec.

Workaround:

Encapsulate OSPF multicast packets within GRE tunnels, which can carry multicast traffic over unicast IPsec tunnels.

Why OSPF over GRE over IPsec Is Necessary (Option C):

GRE Tunnels:

Encapsulate multicast/broadcast traffic into unicast packets. Allow routing protocols like OSPF to function over IPsec VPNs. Compatibility:

GRE is a widely supported protocol across different vendors. Facilitates interoperability between Juniper and third-party devices. Supporting Overlapping Address Spaces (Option B):

NAT over IPsec:

Translates private IP addresses to unique addresses across the VPN.

Prevents routing conflicts and allows communication between sites with overlapping subnets.

Considerations:

Requires proper configuration on both ends of the VPN tunnel.

Third-party devices must support NAT over IPsec.

Reference to Juniper Security Concepts:

Route-Based VPNs:

"Route-based VPNs use virtual tunnel interfaces (st0) and support dynamic routing protocols over

IPsec."

Source: Juniper TechLibrary – Route-Based VPNs

GRE over IPsec:

"GRE over IPsec allows the transmission of multicast and non-IP protocols over IPsec tunnels." Source: Juniper TechLibrary – GRE over IPsec Overview NAT with IPsec VPNs:

"NAT can be applied to IPsec VPN traffic to resolve overlapping address issues and facilitate communication between sites."

Source: Juniper TechLibrary – NAT with IPsec

Final Notes:

Interoperability:

When working with third-party devices, always verify compatibility for protocols and features.

Best Practices:

Use GRE over IPsec for dynamic routing protocols requiring multicast support across IPsec VPNs.

Implement NAT over VPN when dealing with overlapping address spaces.

Question #43

Which two statements are true when setting up an SRX Series device to operate in mixed mode? (Choose two.)

A . A physical interface can be configured to be both a Layer 2 and a Layer 3 interface at the same time.
B . User logical systems support Layer 2 traffic processing.
C . The SRX must be rebooted after configuring at least one Layer 3 and one Layer 2 interface.
D . Packets from Layer 2 interfaces are switched within the same bridge domain.

Lösung einblenden Lösung ausblenden

Question #44

Which two statements about transparent mode and Ethernet switching mode on an SRX series device are correct.

A . In Ethernet switching mode, Layer 2 interfaces must be placed in a security zone.
B . In Ethernet switching mode, IRB interfaces must be placed in a security zone.
C . In transparent mode, Layer 2 interfaces must be placed in a security zone.
D . In transparent mode, IRB interfaces must be placed in a security zone.

Lösung einblenden Lösung ausblenden

Question #45

You have deployed automated threat mitigation using Security Director with Policy Enforcer, Juniper ATP Cloud, SRX Series devices, and EX Series switches.

In this scenario, which device is responsible for blocking the infected hosts?

A . Policy Enforcer
B . Security Director
C . Juniper ATP Cloud
D . EX Series switch

Lösung einblenden Lösung ausblenden

Question #46

A user reports that a specific application is not working properly. This application makes multiple connection to the server and must have the same address every time from a pool and this behavior needs to be changed.

What would solve this problem?

A . Use STUN.
B . Use DNS doctoring.
C . Use the address-persistent parameter.
D . Use the persistent-nat parameter.

Lösung einblenden Lösung ausblenden

Question #47

An ADVPN configuration has been verified on both the hub and spoke devices and it seems fine.

However, OSPF is not functioning as expected.

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements under interface st0.0 on both the hub and spoke devices would solve this problem? (Choose two.)

A . interface-type p2mp
B . dynamic-neighbors
C . passive
D . interface-type p2p

Lösung einblenden Lösung ausblenden